Grocery war forecast for 2012 has local food angle

Price wars are being predicted for food in 2012, thanks mainly to imminent arrival of the latest big box store to hit Canada. But in a strange twist, that could actually end up working in local food producers’ favour.

According to the new 2012 Food Price Index report from economics professors Sylvain Charlebois and Francis Tapon at the University of Guelph, next year’s overall price increase in food should be about two per cent. Input costs such as fuel, fertilizer and crop protection products have levelled out for farmers, putting less pressure on grocery prices which have risen as much as 11 per cent for some commodities this year.

However, the two per cent forecast depends significantly on a couple of things, starting with the weather.

Mother Nature has the final say in weather forecasts.

Unpredictable heat, cold and rainfall continue to influence farming in ways never experienced in modern-era agriculture. Charlebois doesn’t know if, or whether, we’re experiencing short-term or long-term climate change. He just knows that when he looks into the future of food prices these days, he gives a nod to Mother Nature.

“It’s the first thing we mention in our report,” he says. “If the weather cooperates, our predictions will be fine. But how can we know what Mother Nature will do?”

Generally, bad weather means less production and higher consumer prices.

But equally as unpredictable is the global economic situation. Europe is a chronic mess. The U.S. recovery is sluggish and faltering. Even China is experiencing a slowdown as consumers everywhere tighten their belts.

Still, though — and this has always been agriculture’s ace in the hole — people have to eat. And they have to shop somewhere to buy food.

Lately, consumers had more interest in buying local food. Yet they also have a drive to buy food as cheaply as possible, a long-standing trait of Canadian food shoppers.

The latter is well-understood by retailers, and it’s sparked massive grocery competition in this country based mainly on price.

The economists predict turf battles will only intensify when the Target chain moves into Canada.

Target competes head to head with Walmart, which has said it wants to capture as much as four per cent more of the food retail market this year. That’s huge. The economists say that will turn the current price battles into an epic war.

For his part, Charlebois says price pressure on farmers will continue as the war catches fire. Grocers will need to take profits from somewhere, and if consumers won’t pay at the finished-product end, farmers and processors could take a hit.

Yet even though all this, there’s good news for fans of local food and farmers alike.

Target has supply arrangements with Sobey’s, which Charlebois describes as being among the most receptive of the grocery chains to local preferences.

So even though a price war is likely, more opportunities could exist to put local food in front of grocery store shoppers year round. Imagine…a price war based on local food. It’s a long shot, because local food is not likely the kind retailers would discount.

But given the ultra-competitive nature of the market, who knows?

Local food opportunities will depend not just on availability, but also on price. Research influences both factors.

Through agriculture and food research programs such as those at the University of Guelph, sponsored by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, faculty members come up with new technologies, techniques and varieties to help farmers be as efficient as possible.

Because if costs are going up, so must profit. And in an era of small margins and major price wars, research is needed to help profitability grow.

 This column first appeared in the Guelph Mercury online Sunday, December 18. The original version incorrectly noted dairy products had risen more than the 3.5 per cent indicated by Canada’s consumer price index. The Mother Nature graphic is from http://besomebodyblog.com.

Posted in Guelph Mercury | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Put the brakes on the wheat board battle

Ottawa got caught speeding last week. And wow, talk about being mad at the cop who blew the whistle.

Last Wednesday, Ottawa was nabbed for trying to get rid of the Canadian Wheat Board too fast for the law. It doesn’t like the board for allegedly restricting farmers’ marketing freedom (according to the Canadian Wheat Board Act, farmers must sell their export wheat and barley through the board) and it wants it essentially gone by August. It’s put forward new legislation, Bill C-18, called the Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act, to take away the wheat board’s monopoly.

That’s fine. A democratically elected government can change things if it wants to, and if it follows whatever rules are in place for making change.

But it hasn’t, says Federal Court judge Douglas Campbell. Section 47.1 of the current Canadian Wheat Board Act says altering the marketing arrangement for export grain and barley is only possible through a vote of farmers. Ottawa tried to sidestep that law, which was written to prevent exactly what it’s trying to do.

Fast-moving Ottawa said immediately it will exercise its right to appeal — just like any speeder, who figures an injustice has been served.

But most speeders are contrite, even during their appeal.

Not Ottawa. It’s vowing to speed again, and last Wednesday’s ruling did nothing to deter it. “Let me be clear,” said Agriculture and Agri-food Minister Gerry Ritz, “we will never reconsider western wheat and barley farmers’ fundamental right to market their own wheat and barley.”

I’ve always thought it would be wonderful to be a Canadian senator. But this week, I’m not so sure. The Senate has to approve legislation, and Ottawa wants the marketing freedom law pushed through. But even though Senate is heavily peppered with Tories, how can it approve this legislation with a clear conscience? A judge has said the government broke the law by not seeking farmers’ consent. Hello?

Ottawa, do the right thing and put on the brakes. Settle the matter with a vote of farmers, like the law says. If farmers agree with your position, you can have confidence moving forward. If they don’t, you, and they, can figure out some compromise.

Compromise. That’s the Canadian way. The current approach is not.

I write about the wheat board situation in my Urban Cowboy column in the Guelph Mercury.  The photo is from www.topspeed.com.

 

Posted in Guelph Mercury | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Horses for food make some people squirm

Many people are aghast at the prospect of horses being slaughtered for meat, a practice which made headlines last week when the U.S. moved to reinstate it after several dormant years.

Many Americans, and Canadians, had no idea horse slaughter occurred in the first place.

But, in fact, it takes place often, and right under our noses, despite the cultural shock associated with eating horsemeat.

Most North Americans don’t have an appetite for it. With some exceptions, horses are seldom viewed as food animals. For the most part, the public sees them as athletes, beasts of burden, or companion animals.

But North America doesn’t have a monopoly on global food menus. Elsewhere – Europe and Asia, for example – horsemeat consumption is not unusual. At one time, about 140,000 horses were slaughtered in the U.S. each year. Then, in 2006, horse slaughter stopped. The American government was under pressure by activists to ban it.

But instead of being slaughtered in the U.S., they’ve been shipped to horse slaughter-friendly Mexico and Canada. From 2006 through 2010, U.S. horse exports for slaughter increased by nearly 150 per cent to Canada and more than 650 per cent to Mexico.

Finally, earlier last month, the U.S. government very quietly reinstated federal inspection at horse slaughter facilities, after accepting a report from its own accountability office that suggested the alternative to slaughter — that is, abandonment and neglect — was worse.

I talk about this issue in my Urban Cowboy column in the Guelph Mercury.

 

Posted in Guelph Mercury | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments